🔗 Share this article British Broadcasting Corporation Resignations Described as Internal 'Coup' by Ex Newspaper Editor The recent resignations of the British Broadcasting Corporation's director general and its head of news over claims of bias have been characterized as an internal "coup" by a ex media executive. David Yelland, who previously ran the Sun newspaper from 1998 to 2003, claimed during a radio program that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness came after methodical undermining by people close to the corporation's leadership over an extended timeframe. "It constituted a coup, and worse than that, it was an internal operation. There existed individuals within the corporation, extremely connected to the leadership ... on the governing body, who have systematically undermined Tim Davie and his executive staff over a period of [time] and this has been continuing for a considerable period. What transpired yesterday didn't just happen in vacuum," the former editor remarked. Leadership Breakdown Identified "What has occurred here is there existed a breakdown of leadership. I don't hold responsible the leader [Samir Shah] as an individual, but the responsibility of the chair of any institution, a corporation – encompassing the BBC – is to maintain their CEO, their senior executive, in position or dismiss them. And that has not occurred, because Tim Davie hadn't been dismissed. He resigned and so there was, that represents the essence of, a failure of governance." Background of Latest Controversy The departures on Sunday came after period of criticism from the White House and rightwing pundits in the UK that were triggered by allegations published by the Daily Telegraph. The newspaper reported a unauthorized account of the conclusions of a former independent external adviser to its content standards committee, Michael Prescott, who departed his position during the summer. He had criticized the editing of a address by Donald Trump in an episode of Panorama, which he asserted made it appear that Trump had supported the US Capitol incident. Two sections of the speech that were spliced together were delivered an hour apart, and the modification did not note that Trump had also stated he desired his supporters to protest peacefully. Inside Responses and External Viewpoints Yelland's comments mirror a sentiment of concern described by sources within BBC News on Sunday night, with one saying: "It seems like a coup. This represents the outcome of a effort by political enemies of the BBC." Different voices, including Sky's former political editor Adam Boulton, have stated the general impression that Trump encouraged the event was essentially accurate. It is common practice to combine sections of a lengthy address to accurately summarize it. Handover Arrangements and Institutional Effect Davie indicated his exit would not be immediate and that he was "working through" timings to ensure an "smooth handover" over the following period. Turness commented controversy around the Panorama edit had "reached a point where it is causing harm to the BBC – an organization that I value." On Monday, the BBC reporter Nick Robinson revealed there had been paralysis at the highest levels of the BBC because, while its senior reporters wanted to apologize for the production mistake – but insist there was "no plan to mislead" the viewers – the politically appointed leaders wanted to go further. Governmental Response and Broader Perspective Shah is expected to express regret on Monday to the Commons' culture, media and sport committee, and to provide further details on the Panorama episode in his response to the committee, which had asked how he would address the concerns. Speaking after the resignations, the cabinet official Louise Sandher-Jones rejected suggestions the BBC was institutionally partial. The public service official told Sky News: "When you examine the vast range of domestic issues, regional issues, international affairs, that it has to cover, I think its content is highly respected. When I speak to people who've got firmly established opinions on those, they're continuing using the BBC for a lot of their information, it's shaping their perspectives on this."