🔗 Share this article

In my role as a Dungeon Master, I usually shied away from extensive use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying adventures. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be shaped by player choice instead of the roll of a die. Recently, I opted to alter my method, and I'm truly happy with the result.

The Spark: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

An influential actual-play show utilizes a DM who often asks for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails selecting a polyhedral and outlining potential outcomes contingent on the roll. It's at its core no unlike consulting a pre-generated chart, these are created on the spot when a character's decision lacks a obvious outcome.

I opted to test this method at my own game, mostly because it looked engaging and offered a break from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing balance between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my party had just emerged from a massive fight. Afterwards, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a pair—had lived. Rather than picking a fate, I let the dice decide. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, only one succumbed; a high roll, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a incredibly emotional scene where the characters came upon the remains of their friends, still holding hands in death. The group held last rites, which was especially meaningful due to prior story developments. As a parting gesture, I chose that the forms were suddenly restored, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. By chance, the bead's contained spell was exactly what the party required to address another critical quest obstacle. One just orchestrate these kinds of magical story beats.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This incident led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are actually the core of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a detail-oriented DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Players reliably excel at upending the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to think quickly and fabricate details on the fly.

Using similar mechanics is a excellent way to train these skills without straying too much outside your usual style. The trick is to apply them for small-scale circumstances that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the main villain is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to determine if the characters reach a location just in time to see a major incident occurs.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also helps keep players engaged and foster the impression that the adventure is alive, shaping in reaction to their decisions in real-time. It prevents the sense that they are merely characters in a pre-written story, thereby enhancing the collaborative aspect of the game.

This approach has historically been part of the core of D&D. Original D&D were enamored with encounter generators, which made sense for a game focused on exploration. Even though contemporary D&D often prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, it's not necessarily the required method.

Striking the Right Balance

Absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. But, there is also nothing wrong with relinquishing control and permitting the dice to decide some things rather than you. Authority is a major aspect of a DM's role. We need it to manage the world, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core suggestion is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Try a little randomness for minor details. The result could create that the surprising result is significantly more powerful than anything you could have scripted on your own.