🔗 Share this article How Right-Wing Icon to Resistance Icon: The Remarkable Story of the Amphibian This revolution may not be broadcast, yet it might possess webbed feet and large eyes. It also might feature the horn of a unicorn or the plumage of a chicken. Whilst demonstrations against the leadership continue in US cities, participants are utilizing the spirit of a neighborhood dress-up party. They have taught salsa lessons, distributed treats, and performed on unicycles, as armed law enforcement observe. Mixing humour and politics – a strategy social scientists term "tactical frivolity" – isn't novel. However, it has emerged as a signature characteristic of protests in the United States in the current era, adopted by all sides of the political spectrum. A specific icon has emerged as notably significant – the frog. It began when recordings of a confrontation between a protester in an amphibian costume and federal officers in Portland, Oregon, became an internet sensation. From there, it proliferated to demonstrations nationwide. "A great deal at play with that humble inflatable frog," says a professor, who teaches at UC Davis and a Guggenheim Fellow who studies performance art. The Path From a Cartoon Frog to the Streets of Portland It is difficult to talk about protests and frogs without addressing Pepe, a web comic frog adopted by online communities throughout a political race. As the character first took off on the internet, it was used to express certain emotions. Later, its use evolved to express backing for a political figure, even a particular image retweeted by the candidate personally, showing the frog with a signature suit and hair. Images also circulated in certain internet forums in more extreme scenarios, portrayed as a hate group member. Users exchanged "unique frog images" and set up cryptocurrency in his name. His catchphrase, "that feels good", was deployed an inside joke. However the character did not originate as a political symbol. Matt Furie, the illustrator, has been vocal about his distaste for its co-option. His creation was meant as simply an apolitical figure in his comic world. The frog debuted in an online comic in the mid-2000s – apolitical and notable for a quirky behavior. A film, which follows the creator's attempt to reclaim ownership of his creation, he explained the character came from his time with friends and roommates. As he started out, the artist experimented with uploading his work to early internet platforms, where the community began to borrow, remix and reinvent the frog. When the meme proliferated into darker parts of the internet, the creator tried to disavow the frog, even killing him off in a final panel. But Pepe lived on. "It shows that we don't control imagery," says the professor. "They transform and be reclaimed." Until recently, the association of this meme resulted in frogs became a symbol for conservative politics. But that changed in early October, when an incident between a protestor wearing an inflatable frog costume and an immigration officer in Portland, Oregon captured global attention. The event came just days after a directive to send military personnel to the city, which was called "war-ravaged". Activists began to assemble in large numbers on a single block, just outside of a federal building. Tensions were high and a officer sprayed pepper spray at a protester, targeting the ventilation of the costume. Seth Todd, Seth Todd, responded with a joke, stating it tasted like "something milder". However, the video went viral. Mr Todd's attire was not too unusual for the city, known for its unconventional spirit and activist demonstrations that delight in the absurd – outdoor exercise, retro fitness classes, and unique parades. The city's unofficial motto is "Keep Portland Weird." The costume was also referenced in the ensuing legal battle between the federal government and the city, which claimed the use of troops was illegal. Although the court ruled in October that the administration was within its rights to deploy troops, a minority opinion disagreed, mentioning the protesters' "known tendency for using unusual attire when expressing dissent." "Observers may be tempted the court's opinion, which accepts the government's characterization as a war zone, as merely absurd," she stated. "Yet the outcome goes beyond absurdity." The order was stopped legally subsequently, and personnel have reportedly departed the city. But by then, the amphibian costume had transformed into a potent protest icon for progressive movements. This symbol appeared in many cities at No Kings protests that fall. Amphibian costumes were present – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in major US cities. They appeared in rural communities and global metropolises abroad. The frog costume was backordered on major websites, and became more expensive. Shaping the Visual Story The link between Pepe and the protest frog – is the relationship between the humorous, benign cartoon and serious intent. This is what "tactical frivolity." The strategy relies on what Mr Bogad calls the "irresistible image" – frequently absurd, it acts as a "appealing and non-threatening" performance that highlights your ideas without needing explicitly stating them. It's the goofy costume you wear, or the meme you share. The professor is an analyst in the subject and an experienced participant. He's written a book on the subject, and taught workshops around the world. "You could go back to historical periods – when people are dominated, they use absurdity to express dissent indirectly and while maintaining plausible deniability." The purpose of this approach is three-fold, Mr Bogad explains. When activists take on a powerful opposition, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences