🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.